🔗 Share this article

The recent US security policy document presents a misguided view of Europe. The document asserts that open-border policies and so-called "woke" policies represent an grave threat to European civilization. However, this perspective rests on a fundamental misinterpretation of the situation. The true danger confronting the EU is not societal but economic and technological backwardness.

The Stark Growth Gap Separating Europe and the US

The data reveal a sobering contrast. Between 2008 and 2023, American economic output grew by 87%, while a paltry 13.5% growth for the European Union. Over this time, EU GDP per capita dropped from 76.5% to just 50% of the American figure. Remarkably, even the poorest US state now boasts a higher per capita income than major European economies like France and Italy.

Currently, roughly half of the world’s top fifty tech companies are US-based, while a mere four are European.

The Innovation Shortfall: The Core Question

The growing economic gap stems from stronger productivity growth in the United States, largely due to breakthroughs and better use of resources. The landscape of world technology leadership is overwhelmingly American. Over the past five decades, hundreds of American startups have scaled into companies valued at over $10bn, compared with only fourteen in Europe.

This gap raises a pressing question: As the competition for future industries like semiconductors, AI, and fusion energy, what is the EU stand? Most analysts concede it is largely a two-horse race between the United States and China, with European nations entering at a significant handicap.

Underlying Factors of the Continent's Innovation Gap

A number of major reasons explain this innovation chasm.

• Venture Capital: The US boasts a far deeper and agile network for funding startups. Europe still lacks a genuine capital markets union, which limits the scale of emerging companies.
• Regulatory Fragmentation: Complex and divided regulation hamper European business. A American entrepreneur can launch a service under one set of laws to access a consumer base of hundreds of millions. The European Union, despite a larger population size, is split among twenty-seven different national systems, creating huge internal barriers.
• Mindset Differences: Views on risk-taking vary greatly. In some EU nations, a startup's collapse was historically viewed with penalties, whereas in the US, it is often seen as a badge of experience.
• Defense Spending: The US benefits from a deeply integrated academic-military-industrial complex. Europe's chronic underinvestment in military capabilities has eroded its ability in pioneering research.

The Road Ahead: Reasons for Cautious Optimism

Despite these hurdles, one can find causes for hope. European leaders are growing more conscious of the existential challenge and have begun to propose serious reform. Notable reports on EU competitiveness and the single market highlight the necessity of major changes.

With the right incentives and regulatory reforms, Europe's strengths might enable much higher degrees of business-led breakthroughs.

Europe retains significant advantages: high-quality workforce, top-tier schools and universities, and premier labs. Alongside a large internal market and substantial household savings, these elements could trigger a new wave of venture creation.

Crucially, even if Europe does not take the lead in developing cutting-edge tech, it can still significantly boost productivity by implementing and tailoring advancements from other regions.

An Inflection Point

Europe now faces a critical crossroads. To paraphrase a famous line, decline often happens "gradually and then suddenly". So far, Europe's slide in innovation has been gradual. But, if it fails to take bold steps to tackle its deep-seated problems, today's gradual weakening could give way to a sudden and irreversible decline in world influence.